Brooklyn, NY 10036, United States
Mon – Fri: 8:30 am – 5:00 pm, Sat – Sun: Closed

Book an Appointment

Fill out this simple form and we’ll call you right back.

  • Brooklyn, NY 10036, United States
  • Mon – Fri: 8:30 am – 5:00 pm, Sat – Sun: Closed
  • 1-800-123-1234

Carrot Or Stick

My granddaughter loves carrots. She especially loves them with ranch dressing. I’m not sure you could lead her anywhere by dangling a carrot in front of her, but you can get her to eat just about anything if you let her put Ranch dressing on it (like rice). We’ve all heard the concept of the …

My granddaughter loves carrots. She especially loves them with ranch dressing. I’m not sure you could lead her anywhere by dangling a carrot in front of her, but you can get her to eat just about anything if you let her put Ranch dressing on it (like rice).

We’ve all heard the concept of the carrot and the stick. In theory, it comes from historically real examples of farmers dangling a carrot in front of a stubborn donkey to get it to move. If the carrot doesn’t work, the farmer resorts to whacking the donkey from behind with a stick.

Above shot of a group of wet multi colored carrots arranged in a row display

The carrot and stick concept is a simple way to describe foundational human motivations (which are very complex). ‘Pleasure seeking’ and ‘pain avoidance’ are perhaps the most elemental motivators for human behavior. We naturally move toward what feels good and away from what hurts—both physically and emotionally.

Here’s the thing, though. People aren’t donkeys. And treating them like they are tends to produce the exact opposite of what we’re hoping for.

When my granddaughter chooses to dip her rice in Ranch dressing, she’s not being motivated by reward or punishment. She’s genuinely enjoying something she chose. The best team motivation looks more like that than dangling carrots. People want to feel like they’re making choices, not being manipulated into compliance.

There’s a massive difference between motivation and manipulation. Manipulation is about external control. It’s about getting people to do what you want through whatever means necessary. Motivation—real motivation—comes from within. It happens when people believe in what they’re doing, trust the people they’re doing it with, and feel valued in the process.

Brené Brown says, “Clear is kind.” When we’re unclear about expectations, we set people up to fail. Then we get frustrated when they don’t meet standards they didn’t know existed. That’s not fair to them, and it’s not fair to the rest of the team who have to pick up the slack. Being clear about what we expect isn’t mean or controlling. It’s actually one of the kindest things we can do as leaders.

Clear expectations paired with genuine care creates healthy accountability. People need to know where the boundaries are. They need to understand what success looks like. And they need to know that when they mess up (and we all do), someone cares enough to have an honest conversation with them about it.

This is where consequences come in. And I want to be really clear about something here. There is a world of difference between consequences and punishment. Punishment is about exerting control over someone. It’s about making them pay for their mistakes. It makes the whole thing about you and your power.

Consequences are different. Consequences are the natural outcome of choices. They’re about connecting behavior to result. When we clearly identify what the consequences will be for certain decisions, we’re giving people information they need to make good choices. We’re treating them like adults who are capable of learning from their mistakes.

I once worked for a supervisor who would tell you he had never fired anyone. Rather he would say that they had quit. He clearly identified the expectations of the people on his team and the consequences should they choose not to fulfill them. If you tell someone not to touch something because it’s hot, you don’t have to burn them; they will burn themselves if they make a poor choice. 

That doesn’t mean we just let people fail without support. The best leaders create opportunities for trying and failing in a supportive and protective environment. They coach first. They have clear conversations early. They give people chances to correct course before consequences escalate. But they also don’t avoid the hard conversations when behavior consistently falls short of community standards.

Here’s what a lot of leaders miss. When we fail to address behavior that doesn’t meet our standards, we’re not being kind to that person. And we’re definitely not being kind to everyone else on the team who is meeting the standards. Every time we let something slide that we shouldn’t, we’re essentially telling the rest of the team that we don’t value their effort. We’re saying that the standards don’t really matter.

So, what does healthy motivation look like? It starts with trust. When people trust their leaders and when they believe their leaders genuinely care about them, they’re naturally motivated to do good work. They want to contribute. They want to be part of something that matters.

Trust gets built through consistent small actions. Showing up for people. Following through on commitments. Being honest even when it’s uncomfortable. Celebrating wins and acknowledging effort. These aren’t grand gestures. They’re the daily deposits that build into substantial accounts of trust over time.

Healthy motivation also requires that people feel valued. Not just as workers, but as whole human beings with dreams and struggles and lives outside of work. When someone knows you see them—really see them—they bring more of themselves to what they do. They don’t hold back. They don’t just do the minimum required. They give their best because they know it matters to someone who matters to them.

And yes, consequences still have to exist. Even in the healthiest cultures. Maybe especially in the healthiest cultures, because healthy cultures have clear standards and they protect those standards. But when consequences do become necessary, they’re delivered with clarity and care. They’re not about punishment or power. They’re about helping someone understand the connection between their choices and the outcomes.

Sometimes that means hard conversations about performance. Sometimes it means creating a plan for improvement with clear milestones and timelines. And sometimes, honestly, it means helping someone understand that this role or this community might not be the right fit for them. None of that is easy. But all of it is necessary if we’re going to maintain healthy team dynamics.

The carrot and stick model isn’t completely wrong. It just doesn’t go nearly far enough. People do respond to incentives and consequences. But they respond even more powerfully to feeling trusted, valued, and part of something meaningful. They respond to leaders who care enough to be clear and honest with them. They respond to communities that have standards and the courage to maintain them.

My granddaughter doesn’t need a carrot dangled in front of her to get her to eat. She needs options she can choose from, a little creativity with the Ranch dressing, and the trust that she’s making her own decisions. Our teams need something similar. Clear expectations. Genuine care. Trust that they can and will make good choices. And when they don’t, honest conversations about the natural consequences of those choices.

That’s how we create cultures where people want to show up and do their best work. It’s not because we’re dangling rewards or wielding sticks, but because they genuinely want to be part of what we’re building together—the Bison Way.